Have medical care claims changed since the pandemic?
The Covid pandemic brought unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, straining resources, changing treatment plans and affecting patient outcomes.
Inevitably, the pandemic has altered the legal landscape for medical negligence claims in multiple ways, creating both complexities and new considerations. While the core principles of medical negligence remain the same, the pandemic has, in certain respects, altered how certain cases are approached, documented, and resolved. This article explores the impact of Covid on medical negligence claims, examining how the approach to claims has changed both for the healthcare workers and the lawyers.
Have we seen an increase in case numbers?
With healthcare services overwhelmed, many patients experienced delays, misdiagnoses, and refusals of treatment during the pandemic. These issues often were a result of staff shortages, restricted access to machinery and a shift towards remote consultations.
As a result, patients who feel they suffered from inadequate care or delayed treatment have been inclined to seek advice on whether they have a medical negligence claim. The surge in claims has added pressure to the courts which requires to balance addressing grievances with understanding the extraordinary circumstances in which healthcare providers operated.
Has there been any shift in the legal standards applying and the doctrine of reasonable care?
Medical negligence claims are determined by assessing if the healthcare professional has a duty of care; if the duty of care has bene breached and, if so, has this breach caused harm to the patient.
To an extent, claims arising out of the pandemic have perhaps a qualified standard of “reasonable care.” For example, if a hospital was following emergency protocols or national guidance to prioritize Covid patients, it will argue that certain deviations from standard procedures were justified. Courts have and continue to be tasked with evaluating if and when resource constraints, lack of suitable equipment or modified practices can be seen as reasonable.
Some jurisdictions have even introduced temporary legislation to protect healthcare providers from certain types of negligence claims, specifically in cases where care was affected by Covid related factors. These laws recognise that healthcare providers were often doing their best under unprecedented conditions and that imposing standard liability may not be fair or sustainable.
What has been the effect of the wider use of remote consultations and telemedicine?
With Covid making in-person visits challenging, telemedicine became a significant part of healthcare delivery. While convenient and beneficial in reducing exposure, remote consultations also present new risks. Diagnoses via phone or video lack physical examinations, which can lead to missed or incorrect diagnoses. It seems clear that certain conditions, such as cardiac and neurological issues, are more likely to be misdiagnosed through telemedicine.
From a legal standpoint, determining negligence in a remote setting involves evaluating whether the limitations of telemedicine were sufficiently communicated to the patient and if there were adequate follow-up procedures. Courts continue to navigate these cases. Such cases will set precedents which could shape telemedicine standards for years to come.
Are there more claims arising out of delayed treatment?
During the pandemic, many elective and non-urgent procedures were postponed. For some individuals, these delays caused their conditions to worsen, sometimes irreversibly. In certain cases, cancer treatments were delayed, leading to advanced disease stages that could have been avoided with timely intervention. These cases raise questions about whether the delay constituted medical negligence or was an unavoidable consequence of the pandemic.
Inevitably, legal claims relating to delayed treatments will have to address the context of prioritizing limited resources. In negligence cases involving delayed treatment, the victim will need to demonstrate that the delay deviated from what a “reasonable” healthcare provider would have done under similar circumstances. The courts need to consider government and hospital guidelines during the pandemic when determining liability. This, in itself, will complicate the claims process.
How has the increase in claims effected liability insurance?
The increase in Covid related claims has increased insurance premiums for healthcare providers and institutions. Many insurers are loading premiums for claims linked to the pandemic. In some cases, insurance companies have introduced specific pandemic-related exclusions or caps on coverage for claims arising from Covid care.
Such an unprecedented change could influence how hospitals and medical professionals approach high-risk cases in the future, especially in emergency scenarios. Further, victims may find it challenging to obtain compensation if healthcare providers lack sufficient cover leading to yet more legal disputes around liability and insurance obligations.
Is proving harm more challenging?
One of the hurdles to overcome in medical negligence claims is proving that a healthcare provider’s actions directly caused harm. Covid has made this a little more complex. In cases involving delayed care or misdiagnosis, victims must show that these factors directly contributed to their worsened condition, rather than Covid itself or possibly the strain on the healthcare system caused by the pandemic.
Additionally, Covid symptoms and long-term effects can be similar to those of other illnesses, making it difficult to determine if harm resulted from negligence or from the virus itself. For instance, patients who suffered cardiac or respiratory issues during the pandemic may struggle to attribute these complications solely to delayed or inadequate care.
What are the long-term implications for healthcare policy?
The pandemic has prompted governments and healthcare systems to reconsider how they handle emergencies and balance patient rights with public health needs. Legislative changes enacted during and after Covid may influence how healthcare providers and institutions approach future crises. This, in turn, may have lasting effects on medical negligence claims. These adjustments could also result in new patient rights protections, ensuring that patients can access critical care regardless of future emergencies.
Moreover, the experience has highlighted the importance of transparency, particularly around triage decisions, patient communication, and the risks of telemedicine. Policies addressing these issues may emerge, aiming to protect both patients and providers in future pandemics or emergencies.
Where does all this take us?
The Covid pandemic has undeniably transformed the landscape of medical negligence claims, introducing new legal considerations, challenges, and precedents. Courts, lawyers, and pursuers must now navigate these cases understanding the context of the pandemic, balancing fairness to patients with recognition of the unprecedented pressures faced by healthcare providers.
While the legal principles of duty of care, breach, causation, and harm largely remain in tact, the pandemic has underscored the need for adaptability in both healthcare and the legal system. As the world adjusts to a post-pandemic reality, these changes will continue to shape the landscape of medical negligence for years to come.
How to get in touch
If you think you may have a claim for medical negligence, we will be happy to discuss your case with you. Contact us today by completing our online enquiry form or call us on 0800 988 8082 and we will be happy to discuss your case with you
